Simple Guide to Digitizing Film Negatives (2022 Edition)
In this post, I present a simple and inexpensive solution for digitizing film negatives along with an overview of options for inverting and color correcting the digitized negatives. My goal is to cut through all of the BS out there on photo forums (e.g., about the wonders of VueScan or why you need a $650 negative holder/copy stand) and show you how easy it can be to get great results. This post is an update from my previous guide originally published in 2018.
I hope this information will convince you that “your camera is the best scanner” and helps you to get started, but if you plan to do much of this at all, I highly recommend Peter Krogh’s multimedia book, Digitizing Your Photos With Your Camera and Lightroom.
Introduction
I grew up with film because I was born in 1974. I was never all that interested in photography, but I did have cameras and take pictures, so I used film. Mostly I remember using cheap 110 film cameras as a kid-we didn’t have anything nicer. My dad had some kind of SLR, but I was not allowed to touch it. As a teenager, I had a couple of Canon Snappy point and shoots which I thought were great, then when I got married my wife had a nice automatic SLR with a zoom lens (a Chinon Genesis). Unfortunately I never really appreciated that camera (although she took some fantastic images with it) because digital cameras were becoming mainstream at that time and had the big advantage (to my mind) that the photos were on the computer. I got my first digital camera in 2003 (a 4-megapixel Olympus point and shoot) and didn’t touch a film camera again for 14 years.
Over the years, it always bothered me that we had a trunk full of 4×6 prints and film negatives that rarely came out, but we never did anything about it. I did some research once on scanning film negatives, but the consensus then was that it was impossible without specialized film scanning equipment and software. I got serious about photography in 2014 then took an interest in film photography in 2017. After seeing my first batch of scans from the lab, I was convinced I had to scan and convert the negatives myself to get the kind of image quality that I wanted.
Thus began untold hours of searching the internet and scouring discussion forums for the occult knowledge of how to digitize and invert/correct the images. On the digitizing side, there are two camps: those that use scanners and those that use digital cameras. I will allow that the dedicated film scanners of old (e.g., the Plustek, Coolscan, and Dimage) probably provided a great balance of speed, ease of use, and image quality, but sadly those are no longer widely available and reliable. But I spent a month with an Epson flatbed scanner and found it to be intractable for more than an occasional roll of 12 frames of 6×6. The process was excruciatingly slow, the scanner is huge, and the resulting images are not without their problems. Suffice to say that flatbed scanning is not for me, and I was able to achieve much better image quality using a makeshift camera scanning rig. So the flatbed went back to Adorama at the end of 30 days.
I had much better luck camera scanning with a 35mm prime with extension tubes. I used a negative carrier from an enlarger that I bought on ebay taped onto the end of the lens hood to hold the film. Once I became comfortable with camera scanning and achieved some consistency in my process, I realized that this setup was not going to work as a long-term solution and continued the search. At this point, I decided it was time for some true expert advice, so I bought a copy of Peter Krogh’s multimedia book on digitizing photos. Peter is a strong advocate for scanning with a digital camera because of the excellent results that can be obtained and the ease of use compared to a flatbed scanner. I strongly recommend his book, particularly if you are planning to digitize a large collection of negatives, but I am not using the exact process he describes.
My Camera Scanning Setup for 35mm and 120
Assuming you already have a digital camera (DSLR or mirrorless) and macro lens, the only other things you need to digitize your negatives are a film holder, a mechanism to hold the camera perpendicular to the film, and a light source. If you don’t already have a macro lens, you can use an inexpensive macro or a prime lens with extension tubes.
Camera and Lens
I am using my Sony a6500 (and previously a6000) paired with the Sony 30mm f/3.5 Macro lens. I see a lot of posts and questions about using either very expensive modern macro lenses or vintage macro lenses, and there is no need for anything more than a basic, inexpensive macro. The lens I use is $300 new but can be picked up used for much less (I paid $150). It is small and light, has good autofocus, and is very sharp at f/8.
Light Source
The light source was a major struggle for me initially because quality lightboxes are not cheap. Now I have an iPad Pro that I use as a backlight. If you do not already own an iPad, then I recommend getting one to use as your light source. It will also be invaluable for use throughout your photography workflow. I also have the Apple Magic Keyboard which is perfect for holding the iPad behind the film but any kind of iPad stand should be suitable.
Negative Carrier and Rail System
I am using a fairly simple rail system in combination with 35mm and 6×6 negative carriers from an enlarging system that I bought on ebay for about $15 each. For 35mm, the Beseler Negatrans is also a great option for less than $50 (I paid $45 including shipping). Negative carriers were specifically designed to hold film negatives in the enlarger for printing, so they are ideal for digitizing negatives also. There have also been several products brought to market in the last couple of years to address the problem of holding the negative for digitizing. These range from affordable ($55 for the Pixl-latr) to ridiculous ($500+ for the Negative Supply kit or Cameradactyl Mongoose). Although these may work well, I’m not interested in paying more than about $100 for a film holder. (See my recent post comparing these to the Beseler Negatrans for more info.)
The parts for the rail system cost about $90, so total investment for a film scanning rig for both 35mm and 120 is about $120 or maybe $150 to upgrade to the Negatrans. Compare that to the “basic” film scanning kit from Negative Supply that starts at $489.
Update in 2022: I am still using the same rail system as shown above but I’ve replaced the light panel with an iPad, and I ‘m now using a Beseler Negatrans film carrier for 35mm.
The rail system holds the negatives parallel to the camera’s sensor and keeps everything still. I can get very detailed ~24-MP images of the 35mm negatives and ~14-MP single-frame images of 6×6 negatives. This setup also allows for capture of 6×9 negatives or very high resolution images of the 6×6 negatives by panorama stitching multiple exposures. For 6×9 negatives, I simply capture two images of each negative and combine them using Lightroom’s Panorama Photo Merge tool. When cropped to the image area, the resulting digitized images are roughly 24 megapixels. For 6×6, the rail system allows me to move the camera forward, backward, and side-to-side, and the negative holder can be raised and lowered. Combining 3 shots of the 6×6 negative produces a 36-MP stitched image; even higher resolution is possible by moving the lens closer and stitching more images.
Camera Scanning Process
The camera scanning process is simple. Shoot in raw and use aperture-priority exposure with the aperture at f/8 and typically +0.3 exposure compensation to shift the histogram slightly to the right. It is best not to expose to the right too much because the darkest areas of the inverted photo are the lightest on the negative, and overexposing tends to affect detail and contrast in those areas. If you are just starting out, I recommend capturing a few frames and checking the results rather than capturing an entire roll of negatives at once. After you are comfortable with the process and are seeing consistent results you can capture entire rolls without stopping.
For white balancing the raw negative, it is important to capture an image of the unexposed negative either in the area between frames or the area around the image if your negative holder shows it. I typically capture an extra image at the first of the roll in in between frames and use the area outside the image for white balancing.
Also remember that dust is your enemy. If developing at home, scan your negatives as soon as possible once they are dry. For lab developing, leave your negatives in the protective sleeves from the lab until you are ready to load them into the negative carrier. Wear some type of lint-free gloves (I’m currently using nitrile lab gloves) when handling the negatives, and use a rocket blower and/or static brush to clean the negatives as you load them into the carrier. Also, using a diffuse light source will reduce the appearance of dust and lint on the digitized negatives, but you will still have dust to deal with later on.
I use the Sony Imaging Edge software to tether and remotely control the camera for capturing images of the negatives. Using the Sony a6500, the software offers a live view on screen so I never have to touch the camera. Having a large image on my computer monitor simplifies the process of moving and aligning the strip of negatives between frames. I also have Lightroom set to watch and auto-import images as they are scanned, so I can quickly invert and color correct a digitized negative to check exposure or focus if needed while I still have the negatives in the carrier. Usually I will digitize the first couple of frames then check those in Lightroom before capturing the remainder of the roll.
I also recommend capturing a blank frame for flat field correction. It may not be needed, but if it is needed there is no way to capture the flat frame after the fact. I typically apply flat frame correction to all of my color negative scans but it’s not usually needed for black and white film. (Side note: the Lightroom Flat Field Correction tool can be a real pain. I’ve found that it can use a random frame instead of the calibration frame which ruins the images. Typically I apply Flat Frame Correction to no more than 3 images at a time so that I can closely monitor the process.)
Inversion and Color Correction
I work primarily in Lightroom because I prefer working with an all-RAW workflow (Photoshop TIFs are typically 150+ MBs), so I am biased towards solutions that maintain that RAW workflow. But there are other options out there so I have listed a few of those in this discussion. I use Negative Lab Pro and strongly recommend it.
Negative Lab Pro
Negative Lab Pro is a plugin for Lightroom that provides a new interface for converting negatives. Negatives can be scanned using a traditional scanner or digitized using a digital camera. Negative Lab Pro produces fantastic results, provides an all-RAW workflow within Lightroom, and is my choice for inverting film negatives. I have a full review of version 1.2 from 2019 and am working on an updated review of the current and much improved version 2.3. Negative Lab Pro costs $99.
Lightroom Profiles
Until the April 2018 update to Lightroom, it was not possible to easily get consistent, reproducible results working exclusively in Lightroom, but it is now possible to create and use profiles in Lightroom for negative inversion and color correction. The profiles must be created in Photoshop and are specific to your particular digitizing process, but once created they can be used to invert and color correct any negatives from that same film stock within Lightroom and often with just one click to apply the profile. I included a full demonstration of this process in my original digitizing guide.
Grain2Pixel
Grain2Pixel is a Photoshop-based app which converts scans from a digital camera or traditional scanner to positive scans without using Adobe Camera Raw. The author claims that ACR makes irreversible changes to the image file that are difficult to counteract, so Grain2Pixel makes the conversion from RAW directly. I have downloaded Grain2Pixel and converted the image below but don’t plan to test it further. Grain2Pixel is free.
ColorPerfect
ColorPerfect is a Photoshop plugin that seems to work similarly to Grain2Pixel. I have not tested it and do not plan to but I have read many favorable reviews online. ColorPerfect costs $67.
Manual
It is possible to manually invert film negatives using the individual RGB tonal curves in Photoshop, Lightroom, or other editors. Not recommended.
Light Source Color Compensation
Peter Krogh recommends using a dichroic light source that can be tuned to neutralize the mask of each specific type of film. I don’t have one of those, but using an iPad as the light source, I can simply create a full-screen image in Photoshop to use as the background using whatever color is needed to neutralize the negative mask. Previously I was using a set of gels that worked well (see Equipment List below for details). The use of a colored light source helps to balance the colors captured by the camera so that the digitized negative has a better balance of red, green, and blue. Although the colors can be corrected without using color compensation, I am getting better results neutralizing the film mask, particularly in blue skies and in the shadows of the positive image. I have written a separate post about my results using color filters when digitizing negatives.
Here’s a comparison of a negative captured without and with color correction gels. Note that straight out of camera, the negative on the right is already nearly white balanced. The histograms below the image show the separation between the blue and red channels in the unfiltered negative. Even though these are raw images, the inversion and color correction includes some extreme adjustments to the color channels. By using the color filters, the raw image starts out more balanced and the end results are cleaner because less extreme adjustments to the red and blue channels are required. For a more detailed explanation of why this works, refer to Peter’s excellent book.
Equipment List
Camera/lens: I’m using a 24-MP Sony a6500 camera with 30mm f/3.5 macro lens. The macro lens produces very sharp images and provides autofocus on the negatives. Tethered shooting with on-screen live view is available using Sony’s Imaging Edge Remote software.
Film Holders: I am using negative carriers from enlargers. These are readily available on ebay for $20 or less. Get one for each size of film that you work with. These can be attached to the rail with screws or epoxy. Also consider the Beseler Negatrans for 35mm.
Light Source: 12.9-inch iPad Pro, but any iPad will work. Previously I used an Artograph Lightbox but the iPad works MUCH better.
Rail System: I’m using the Desmond DVC-220 rail, Desmond DPLEX-50 clamp to hold the camera, and Desmond DPL-100 100mm lens plate with a negative carrier mounted at one end.
Color Correction: (Update: I’m now using the iPad Pro as the light source so no longer need to use the gels.) Set of 3 color filters to help neutralize the orange mask at the time of capture. I’m using Rosco Cinegel #3202: Full Blue (CTB), Cinegel #3204: Half Blue (1/2 CTB), and Cinegel #4415: 15 Green based on a recommendation from John Fechner (fechnerimaging.smugmug.com).
hi I happen to stumble across your website – wonderful images and review on the equipment, I am also using a negatrans by beseler – with a nikon D750 / 55mm micro lens over a 3D printed light holder over a Raleno PLV-104 LED video light – I use a copy stand mini 300 I got on eBay –
my problem is that the negatrans is always acting up – i quit using the roller function as it just doesn’t work, I took it apart but the rubber o rings just keeps slipping off the tracks … I end up pulling the film through by hand. so long story short I am trying to find an alternative 35mm film holder – yes – paying 300 for a negative supply seems too much for a hobby at this point.
Hi Samson,
Thank you very much. I believe you can replace the o-ring in the Negatrans to solve your issue. I recall seeing several o-rings on ebay when I was searching for a Negatrans to purchase. Mine works great pulling the film through from left to right, but it does not reverse the film backwards.
Thank you
Hi, Thank you very much for the info!
I am currently using a Nikon D600 body and 60mm Nikkor macro lens in conjunction with a cheaper JJC digitizing and film holder system (cheaper Chinese copy of a Nikon system) – with good results.
In film photography I shoot mainly in B & W and meter for the shadows (those shadows where I ideally still want to see some details ) and underdevelop negatives by approx 10%. However, with eventual digitizing the B & W negative in mind (converting the negative to RAW in the digital camera body )would you still recommend metering the film camera (when taking images) in this way or metering in a different way?
Thanks Philip Jooste
Hi Philip,
It sounds like you are trying to ensure that the exposed negative captures shadow detail as much as possible, then by underdeveloping the film you are reducing contrast in the developed negative since the hybrid digital workflow allows you to adjust contrast later after the negative has been digitized. I am in no way an expert on film development and processing, but this sounds like a reasonable approach and is similar to the ETTR (expose to the right) technique in digital photography aimed at capturing the most information at the time of exposure rather than trying to capture the final image “in camera”.
hi
how did you attach the film holder, plain and later negatrans to the desmond 100mm plate? i am interested to know the detail as I am not very handy. thank you very much.
Hi Rob,
I used JB Weld epoxy, but you could use any type of super strong epoxy/glue like Gorilla Glue. I used a large clamp to secure the two parts together until the epoxy was fully cured, and this also ensures that the rail and film holder are aligned parallel so that the film plane will be perfectly perpendicular to the camera axis. The real trick is trying to make sure that the film holder is perfectly aligned vertically with the rail. None of mine are perfect, so I always have to rotate the digitized negative a little bit in Lightroom. Good luck!